|
ArchiLab,
5th Orléans International Architectural Conference. Two days of
Meetings. Two
days of meetings have been programmed by Marie-Ange Brayer, Director of
the FRAC Centre and Frédéric Migayrou, Chief Curator of
the Architecture and Design Departments, MNAM-CCI , Centre Pompidou).
The first day of round tables will bring together some thirty international
teams of architects who have taken part in previous ArchiLab conferences.
Day two will include lectures from a dozen international curators and
critics, dealing with the collection concept in its relationship to the
history and current state of architectural production. 11 June 2003 : The Challenges of architecture today
The first day of meetings will be a sort of summary of the first four
ArchiLab conferences, from 1999 to 2002, raising the issue of the challenges
of architecture today. During these four years, some 300 international architects and critics had a chance to meet in Orleans and take part in the Conferences. In 2002, a first symposium on Architectural Criticism involved some twenty critics.
All
the postwar architectural tendencies are structured in a critical demarcation
with regard to modern architecture. The on-going critical questioning
of the principles of modernism defined the whole field of an "après-
modern" which had taken on the forms and aspects of different precepts
of "postmodernism". How has the theoretical discourse influenced
the praxis of architects at an international level? Is it still possible,
today, to abide by this hermeneutic and critical strategy of a reference
to the modern at a time when the most essential conditions of a production
of architecture have shifted, caught up in the industrial systems of logic
of globalization and the new economics of information networks? ------In
search of the architectural minimum 11h30-12h45 Faced with a ubiquitous industrialization which has, in an extreme way, normalized all the dimensions of architectural production, from programmes to constructive principles, the architect has given way to design departments and engineering agencies. Creating a new resource from this material state of a worldwide architecture, and setting it up as a new materiality has prompted many architects to "positivize" this situation by neutralizing all aesthetic discourse on the part of the architect. Minimal architecture, poor architecture, reduced to its component parts, assemblage praxis, reduced use of standard products and materials, lower-cost architecture--what is the limit of this architecture of withdrawal, of this praxis of saying "less", and of disappearance?
What
was the nature of the swing of the industrial world into the world of
information, networks, and technological, computer flows? How has this
situation managed to change the logic of the project, by deterritorializing
architecture? From the digital file to the machine, from object to city,
digital systems will, in a limitless way, condition the actual economics
of architectural design and production, forming a new space-time, the
territory of an architecture caught by exchange and flows, a field where
architecture has shifted into the field of the simultaneous. ------The
architect's areas of practice 16h-17h15 After the issues raised by the first three round tables, the state of architecture today will be broached, by way of the definition of the architect's areas of practice. After the apotheosis of the commission, and the boom in symbolic buildings during the 1980s, what, today, is the architect's place in relation to those organizing commissions? How can he still preserve the terrain of his own praxis, between individual and collective commission? Is the architect still capable of acting on the urban organization, or is he/she being marginalized by the industrial logic of construction?
12
June 2003 : Memory and topicality of architecture... after the "end
of history"
The second day of meetings will being together ten curators and critics
in the form of lectures, which will question the dialectic between the
memory of architecture and its current state. What is the place of history
in architecture collections ? How do they incorporate the latest work?
What, today, does the end of history mean? 9h30-10h
: Bart Lootsma, Critique d'architecture, Commisaire d'Archilab 2004 14h30-15h
: Andrea Branzi (I), Historien, Critique d'architecture Production : City of Orléans
ArchiLab contact : Christelle Lecoeur
|